Growing up, it was hard to see teams other than the “big boys” in college football; especially in the New York City area, before Connecticut went to the D-I aka FBS level, and while Rutgers was just poor. I didn’t know anyone who stopped everything for Saturday football; the teams that came on – even close ones like Penn State – had no relation to my life. I never knew of the need to see one’s football team, the wearing of college football colors, the sense of regional pride that the southern and plains and midwestern teams engendered.
One of those teams – specifically, Nebraska football – is the reason I got in to college football. In college, I lived in a 6 person suite, with a room right next to the common area, where we had a small TV. My suitemate from Omaha was a huge Huskers fan. Huge. I would be working (or drinking) late into the night on Fridays. He used to wake me up on Saturday, about 11.20 AM yelling about some Nebraska foible… while they were up 14 on, say, Troy State. That made me cranky as hell, so I brushed up on my football so I could insult the Cornhuskers, especially when they played Mizzou… or some team that might actually beat them in the 90’s.
The fervor was not restricted to Nebraska, of course. And the proliferation of cable/ satellite options, channels, and regional programming means that more people can feed their need for information. There is obviously a demand to not only see one’s teams, but the get the “inside scoop,” the “candid” and “unfiltered” information – to get close to one’s team. The best way of doing this is either to find a news outlet with a huge budget to cover the team, or to localize the news.
Those Nebraska fans, would travel from far and wide to see their team live – putting money into ticket sales, gasoline, tailgating food; there is a cost that they are willing to pay to experience Nebraska football. Now, the school will test the price tag of that dedication by showing their first three non-conference games in pay-per-view format. The linked article touches on the revenue concept for many bigger-time teams, schools, and conferences looking for ways to control their revenue streams and differentiate viewers, separating the casuals from the die-hards, who will pay much more per view than you and I might through our cable or satellite package. And that money goes to the school and their content distributor.
I suppose that this is problematic, as we expect to get our sports television for a small fee; but there are fans who pay good money to get the aforementioned “insider” information on recruiting sites; conference specific television; and team-specific networks in major markets that might, like the Yankees will, expand into in-market online deals at an advanced price.
These moves, if profitable, start to inform both sports broadcasters, cable/ satellite tv companies (dealing with competition from online sites like Hulu), and sports fans about what the model will be going forward for sports. Segmenting fans helps bring the right money to the producers and determines the actual value of the product, on the business side.
But on the fan side, this kind of segmentation can be parsed too finely. The pay-per-view model loses the fairweather fans and the casual sports fans. And will pay per view remove the socia aspect of watching the game at a dedicated bar over wings and beer? What value do those fans have to the schools and the media producers? This experiment will start to delve into the question.
+ Not a storyline per se, but Free Darko
+ And then there’s the Brandon Jennings thing. Ball in Europe talks about how Jennings’ season was a
Who would believe you can get
Samardo Samuels (Louisville), 
* Emmanuelle Chriqui threw out the first pitch at a Dodgers game earlier this week. Hat tip to
Not sure that Bobby Gonzalez is still on that list; his beef with the Athletic Director seems to have quieted down, and he is bringing some talent in to Seton Hall. Iowa’s coach Todd Lickliter seems to be more deserving than Bobby; a lot of turmoil in the Hawkeyes, who were just terrible in a year where the Big Ten’s weak siblings started hitting back. As for Seton Hall, the coming year could have tumult, as three transfers hope to make their mark on the Pirates. Will the current and incoming players be happy with their minutes? Will Bobby thrive or draw undue attention to himself? There are a few players with NBA aspirations in Herb Pope and Jeremy Hazell; will they mesh?
Fred Hill has brought in talent and is going into his 4th year… which is enough time to make your team look better than it has. I do think he should be higher on the list, but lists like these are starting points for conversations. But if Hill brings in some good talents for 2010 – no one is signed as yet – with the remaining scholarships, does he stay on, even if the on-court results are underwhelming? In this way, talent can hold up a school; if the AD is convinced that a lack of talent is the problem, a coach may get a little extra time to bring in players, when there is evidence that the game coaching and player development is not up to snuff. Not saying that’s what is happening in New Brunswick (or Piscataway, wherever the campus technically is), but it’s something to think about.
At St. John’s, Coach Norm Roberts is in an interesting position – one would think he is under some pressure to win, but is a winning season enough to keep his position? It might be, especially since he has conducted himself to the media with class. His name is synonymous in articles with "good guy." There is more talent this year, though Roberts needs more talent to make a solid contender in the league. But letting him go would pass the burden of replacing 9 players in one year (when the current rising junior class leaves in 2011). Or on the other hand… that could be a clean slate for the next coach.
If a coach doesn’t get fired after not winning a regular season game in his conference, when does he get fired? One can say that, like Ernie Kent or Paul Hewitt, the Athletic Directors decided that Jerry Wanwright’s year was an abberation, but still, that is a lot of losing. There needs to be more local talent on the Chicago roster. If Wainwright gets some solid Chicago players to sign, does he get another year or two to coach them? As it stands now, there is not a whole lot of turnaround hope for next year, with Mac Koshwal thinking about going pro and Dar Tucker thinking that way as well.
hype was rewarded by two Final Four teams. It should be noted that there were also 5 Sweet Sixteen squads: Louisville, Connecticut, Pittsburgh, Villanova, and Syracuse, and one of the best games of the tournament’s second weekend, a 78-76 thrill ride between Pittsburgh and Villanova. It was a good year for the basketball teams in the conference, tipsy with fame and accolades.